ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Radial Versus Femoral Arterial Access for Cardiac Catheterization: Comparison of Complications at 30 Days
Cardiac catheterization has traditionally been performed via access to the arterial circulation from the femoral artery located in the groin. As an alternative to this approach, the radial artery, located in the arm, is gaining wider use in clinical practice. Multiple studies have demonstrated that cardiac catheterization via the radial approach has a very low complication rate, in the short term. This study is intended to determine if there are any differences in the long term complication rate between radial artery cardiac catheterization as compared with femoral artery cardiac catheterization.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Caring for the Radial Artery Post-angiogram#1140458
- Study Comparing the Handling of Two Peripheral IV Catheter Systems#903082
- The Optimal Leg Angulation of Femoral Central Catheterization in Pediatrics#838718
- UltraSound Guided Distal Radial Artery vS Conventional Transradial Access for Interventional Coronary Angiography#868103
- Radial Access for Abdominopelvic Vascular Intervention#1150121
Record · ID 912217
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive