ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Post-operative Sensitivity in Composite Restorations
Participants will be divided into groups. In group A, Composite restoration done using oblique incremental technique. In group B, Bulk-fill technique was used. VAS scoring to evaluate the primary outcome at one day, one week and two weeks.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in Restoring of Primary Molars#1094930
- Bronchoscopic Versus Airway Exchange Catheter-Guided Endotracheal Tube Exchange#833174
- Endocrown Restorations Longevity Compared With Post Retained Restorations#1127403
- Comparison of Simple and Continuous Suture Techniques in Oral Surgery#902939
- Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Tooth Graft Versus Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Graft.#905245
Record · ID 912256
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive