ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
IVM Survey Among Reproductive Medicine Specialists
Although IVM as a laboratory technology in reproductive medicine has existed for many decades, there is a lack of well-designed studies comparing the efficiency and the patient satisfaction related to IVM as compared to standard ovarian stimulation for IVF. In view of this, and in order to identify unmet needs of fertility specialists with regard to the application of IVM, the investigator developed the idea of a worldwide web-based survey analysis of fertility specialists' insights and experiences regarding IVM.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Injection Free IVF#838809
- Potential increase of the U.S. total fertility rate resulting from restorative treatment of unresolved subfertility: a simulation study.#327213
- Contraception in Normal and Subnormal Men#1072494
- CLBR Per Initial Cycle With Different Starting Dose in Aged Patients With Poor Ovarian Reservation: 300IU Versus 150IU#907193
- Prescribing Lorazepam for IUD Insertion: Pilot Feasibility Study#879813
Record · ID 912343
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive