ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Clinical Impact of Uterine Repair During Cesarean Section with Barbed Suture on the Incidence of Isthmocele
Pregnant women, irrespective of their pregnancy risk, who undergo a cesarean section for any reason will be randomized to one of two suturing techniques: conventional suture or barbed suture for uterine repair after the cesarean section. Following surgery, these patients will be followed up for clinical outcomes, ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar, and study of the hypoxic-inflammatory environment of the uterine cavity.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Suture Material and C-Section Scar Niches: A Comparative Study#849592
- Isthmocele After Endometrial and Non-endometrial Suturing in Cesarean Section#1163104
- Ultrasound Evaluation of Cesarean Scar After Uterotomy Closure With Barbed and Conventional Sutures#980951
- Suture Versus Glue (Dermabond) Closure During Cesarean Delivery#1010291
- Comparison of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Cesarean Section#882675
Record · ID 913149
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive