ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Efficacy of Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation and Sacral in Treating Non-obstructive Neurogenic Urinary Retention
To observe the clinical effects and make a comparative study between efficacy of electrical pudendal nerve stimulation (EPNS) and sacral neuromodulation (SNM) , evaluate the advantages of EPNS in the treatment of neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention, and provide a new method for the treatment of the disease.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Long Term Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Modulation (SNM) in Patients With Constipation or Stool Incontinence#824841
- Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation on Constipation#916907
- SNM vs. HBOT for Refractory IC/BPS#1141155
- Best Surgical Technique for Optimal Lead Placement in Sacral Neuromodulation - a Comparative Cadaver Study#1009576
- Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Combination With Biofeedback#916981
Record · ID 913178
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive