ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Complications Associated With Central Venous Access in the NSICU: PICC vs CVC
The goal of this study is to determine whether Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter or Centrally Inserted Venous Catheters have lower complication rates in the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit. After admission to the Neuroscience ICU and if they require central access, patients will be randomized to receive a PICC or CVC and complications (such as pneumothorax, deep venous thrombosis, infection, etc.) will be tracked and compared between the two interventions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The PROOF Study: The PICC Related Obstruction Of Flow Study#901275
- Correlation Between External Jugular Venous and Superior Vena Cava Central Venous Blood Oxygen Saturation in Patient Under General Anesthesia#868021
- Complications and Adverse Effects in Continuous Peripheral Regional Anesthesia#979519
- Hemoglobin Saturation in Superior Vena Cava and Right Atrium#967374
- Central Venous Catheter Insertion Site and Colonization in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery#1007432
Record · ID 913318
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive