ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Prefabricated Versus 3D-Printing Myofunctional Appliances
The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the dentoskeletal effects of Class II division 1 treatment in growing patients with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printing myofunctional appliance.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Laboratory-Fabricated and 3D-Printed Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances#886866
- Assessment of Wear and Muscular Efficiency of 3D Printed Versus Conventional Denture Teeth: A Cross-Over In Vivo Study#908756
- Clinical Evaluation of Conventional and 3D-printed Implant-supported Overdentures Retained With New Attachment Systems#853758
- Retentive Strength of Denture Adhesives on Various RR Ridges#1112061
- Dentoskeletal Effects of 3D-Printed Fixed Twin Block Versus MARA Appliances in Management of Skeletal Class II#836655
Record · ID 913670
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive