ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Perioperative Epidural Versus Intravenous Local Anesthetic Infusion in Open Upper Abdominal Surgery
The study evaluates the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine as an analgesic modality in patients undergoing open upper abdominal surgery; when compared with thoracic epidural analgesia. Half of participants will receive intravenous lidocaine infusion, while the other half will receive thoracic epidural bupivacaine infusion.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Analgesic Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain Following Adult Spine Surgery#801797
- Intrapleural Ropivacaine Infusion in Cardiac Surgery#890195
- a Pilot Study of Lidocaine Infusion for Postoperative Analgesia in Elderly Patients With Colorectal Cancer Surgery#1058687
- Lidocaine vs. Lidocaine With Dexmedetomidine for Intravenous Regional Anesthesia (IVRA) in Upper Limb Surgery#844365
- Perioperative Lidocaine Administration in Thoracoscopic Surgery for Improved Postoperative Pain Control#1075495
Record · ID 914553
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive