ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis
Fifty six patients were randomly enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly stratified into two control groups and two test groups, from which conventional pick up and digital impressions were made respectively. Patients of group 1 (CIG Axial) and 3 (DIG Axial) received 4 axial implants whereas, group 2 patients (CIG Tilted), and group 4 (DIG Tilted) received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants. All participants received hybrid dentures. Bone loss, implant loss, maintenance of prosthesis were evaluated at 6m,12m, and 24 months follow up period.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Time and Cost-implications of Intraoral Scans Vs Alginate Impressions#1031682
- Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review#345451
- Complete Digital Workflows for the Treatment With Multiple-unit Implant-supported Fixed Dental Prostheses (iFDP)#863017
- The Acceptability of Digital Impression Compared to Conventional Technique in Children#1172501
- Performance and Safety Use of the Mono Block Implant "KONTACT MB"#867381
Record · ID 915539
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive