PhilArchive
open access
Decision Competence Enablement (DCE)
Contemporary decision neuroscience models decision-making as a neural process involving evidence accumulation, valuation, and commitment. While these models successfully describe how decisions unfold once neural dynamics are operative, they systematically presuppose the biological availability of such dynamics. This paper identifies this presupposition as a conceptual gap in the scientific explanation of decision-making. I introduce the Decision Competence Enablement (DCE) framework, which specifies the physiological conditions under which neural decision models become applicable. DCE conceptualizes cardiac function and cardio-autonomic regulation as enabling infrastructures that make neural decision dynamics biologically possible. These processes neither encode decision content nor replace neural mechanisms. Rather, they constitute necessary preconditions for the initiation and stabilization of neural activity required for decision-making. By distinguishing enabling conditions from implementing mechanisms, the DCE framework clarifies why existing decision models—despite their empirical success—remain explanatorily incomplete. Decision competence is introduced as a distinct scientific explanandum, allowing the scope and limits of neural decision models to be explicitly articulated.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The CMT Model of Free Will#775467
- Reply to: "No evidence of neural feature-specific pre-activation during the prediction of an upcoming stimulus".#235946
- Freedom Without Magic: A Naturalistic Theory of Free Will as Socially Recursive Active Inference#694324
- Your Brain as the Source of Free Will Worth Wanting: Understanding Free Will in the Age of Neuroscience#756019
- A mechanistic alternative to minimal sufficiency as the guiding principle for NCC research#118809
Record · ID 91570
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive