ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Trueness of Digital Occlusal Analysis
The aims of this observational study are to evaluate the trueness of two different digital occlusal analyzers; handheld occlusal analyzer versus intraoral scanner in comparison to conventional methods in identifying true occlusal contacts and to evaluate inter-examiner reliability of two examiners independently analyzing occlusal contacts.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Occlusal Geometry in Closed Form for Orthodontic Report Generation#1071044
- Evaluation of the Impact of Integrating Dynamic Patient-Specific Motion and Implementing a Jaw Tracking System in the Attribution of the Occlusion in Full-Arch Restorations Through a Digital Workflow: A Clinical Study#839541
- Diagnostic Effectiveness of Virtual Bronchoscopy#908513
- Comparación en la Precisión de la Identificación del Primer Contacto Oclusal entre Modelos Articulados y Modelos Digitales Obtenidos con los Escáneres 3shape Trios e Itero#1055153
- AMOUNT OF INTRAORAL OCCLUSAL ADJUSTMENTS IN OCCLUSAL SPLINTS FABRICATED USING FULLY DIGITAL VERSUS COMBINED DIGITAL WORKFLOW IN TMD PATIENTS#1103845
Record · ID 915952
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive