ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Sutureless Vs. Standard Biological Prostheses for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
Multicenter randomised study which aims to compare sutureless Vs. standard bio- prostheses (1:1) among patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement in terms of: * 6 -month hemodynamic performance. * 6 month clinical outcomes including all cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, valve reoperation and major/life threatening bleeding * Cost effectiveness
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versu Surgical Aortix Valve Replacement for Treating Elderly Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annuli: A Prospective Randomized Study The VIVA Trial#992676
- The Study of Biological Prosthetic Heart Valves With the "Easy Change" System#1114153
- Feasibility And Safety of Early Discharge After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation#844344
- A Prospective Multicenter Pivotal Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Venus-Neo Surgical Aortic Valve#894694
- Post-market Clinical Monitoring of the Safety and Efficacy of the Aortic Valve Bioprothesis#918391
Record · ID 916752
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive