ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) vs Gutta-Percha for Non-Surgical Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth With Apical Lesions
The main objective of this study is to compare the healing rate of periapical lesions after non-surgical endodontic retreatment in teeth obturated with gutta-percha versus those obturated with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), with a 12-month follow-up. Secondary objectives include evaluating differences between groups in healing time, postoperative pain, and tooth discoloration.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Tooth Discoloration Induced by Pulpotomy Materials#1114578
- Sealers in Chronic Apical Lesions#893088
- Postoperative Pain Evaluation After Obturation With Different Sealers#878624
- Stainless Steel Crowns Versus Bulkfill Composite Resin for Restoring Primary Molars After Endodontic Treatment#899675
- Non-Surgical Single Visit Endodontic Retreatment in Cases With Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis Using Bioceramic Sealer#826970
Record · ID 916898
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive