ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Visual Outcomes of Functional Intraocular Lenses in Cataracts
This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized comparative study. The purpose of the study is to evaluate and compare the objective and subjective visual outcomes of different types of functional intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Visual Function#1170516
- Comparing Visual Outcomes in Matched Patients Receiving a Low Cylinder Power Toric IOL or a Non-toric IOL#903166
- Long-term Comparative Analysis of Visual Outcomes With 3 Intraocular Lenses: Monofocal, Trifocal and Accommodating#825977
- Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-group Comparison of Two Refractive EDOF Intraocular Lenses: Johnson & Johnson Tecnis PureSee Versus 1stQ Comfort Z-EDOF#887135
- Visual Function After Implantation of AcrySof® Toric Lens#889845
Record · ID 916937
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive