ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
High Flow Nasal Cannula in Comparison With Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome
To compare the primary outcome, failure of extubation defined by the need for re-intubation and mechanical ventilation within 5 days of initial extubation and secondary outcomes, morbidities and mortality after using of heated humidity high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) in the immediate post-extubation period for preterm infants between 24 and 28 weeks gestation with respiratory distress syndrome.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- NIPPV Versus Bi-level Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Following Extubation#906624
- Nasal HFOV Versus Nasal CPAP to Reduce Post-extubation pCO2#1112632
- Environmental or Nasal Cannula Oxygen for Preterm Infants Receiving Oxygen Therapy: a Randomized Cross-over Pilot Study#1164855
- Comparing HHHFNC and nCPAP Ventilation Methods for the Prevention of Extubation Failure in Preterm Infants#879564
- High Flow Nasal Cannula in Preterm Infants#891311
Record · ID 917004
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive