ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Injectable Bioactive Composites vs RMGI for Proximal Cavities in Primary Molars
This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of injectable bioactive composite (Beautifil Flow Plus X, Shofu) versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer (RMGI) in restoring proximal cavities (Class II) in primary molars of children aged 3-8 years over a 12-month follow-up period, using revised FDI criteria.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars#869901
- Repair Versus Replacement of Failed Restorations in Primary Teeth#896262
- Efficacy of Calcium Silicate Pulp-capping; a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial#907068
- Soft Tissue Responses Around Nanostructured Calcium-phosphate-coated Implant Abutments on Dental Implants: Histological, Genetic and Clinical Evaluation in Smokers and Non-smokers.#899741
- Clinical Performance of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth#887652
Record · ID 917159
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive