ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Gastric Bypass for Private Pay Patients Seeking Obesity Surgery
The purpose of this study is to determine laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a safer surgery than the gastric bypass, gives similar weight losses and that the safety of gastric in private pay patients versus insurance patients will be similar. This is a retrospective chart review of intervention charts.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Single Anastomosis Duodenal Ileal Bypass (SADI) for Sleeve Revision#812293
- Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With and Without Omentectomy#910931
- Laparoscopic Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy For Morbidly Obese Patients#812534
- Sleeve Gastrectomy as a Standard Bariatric Procedure#1074477
- Istmin Levels in Laparoscopik Sleeve Gastrectomy#1033239
Record · ID 917946
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive