ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Percutaneous Ketamine Versus Lidocaine for Mid-Sternotomy
Since midsternotomy is painful postoepratively, and since ketamine has been shown to be optimal postoeprative analgessic adjuvant, the investigators wish to assess its percutaneous preemptive effect, comparing it to lidocaine effect.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficacy of Ketamine Added to Local Anesthetic in Modified Pectoral Block for Management of Postoperative Pain#1103923
- Comparing Three Different Doses of Intrathecal Ketamine#1139208
- Study on Opioid-free Anesthesia Protocol With S-ketamine and Propofol#869034
- Escalating Ketamine Doses and Pre-emption#892622
- Effect of Perioperative i.v. Low-dose S(+) Ketamine#873162
Record · ID 918859
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive