ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Treatment of Skeletal Open Bite With Open Bite Activator and Skeletal Anchorage-Supported Vertical Elastics
This study evaluated a new treatment approach for skeletal open bite in growing individuals using an open bite activator combined with anterior skeletal anchorage-supported vertical elastics. An open bite is a condition where the front teeth don't touch when the back teeth are closed together, creating a gap. Traditional treatments often use extraoral appliances (devices worn outside the mouth), which can be uncomfortable and aesthetically unappealing, leading to poor patient compliance. We included 24 growing patients (14 females, 10 males) aged 12-14 years with skeletal open bite. All participants received an open bite activator (a removable functional appliance) and mini-screws placed between the upper and lower lateral and canine teeth. Vertical elastics were connected between these mini-screws, applying 150g of force for 20-22 hours daily over 12 months. Lateral cephalometric radiographs (specialized X-rays) were taken before treatment and after 12 months to evaluate changes in facial bone structure and tooth positions. Our results showed successful correction of open bite with an average increase in overbite of 3.35mm. We observed favorable skeletal changes including clockwise rotation of the maxilla (upper jaw), counterclockwise rotation of the mandible (lower jaw), and decreased vertical facial dimensions. This treatment approach offers a viable alternative to conventional methods that rely on extraoral appliances, potentially improving patient comfort and compliance. The protocol successfully addresses both skeletal and dental components of open bite malocclusion in growing patients.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance#908411
- Correlation Between Somatic Growth and Number of Erupted Deciduous Teeth#864520
- Contemporary surgical approaches for the closure of maxillary sinus defects with clinical cases from the authors’ practice#366032
- Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of The Effect of Acetal Resin Versus PEEK on Supporting Structure of Abutment Teeth#1059171
- Oval Abutment Versus a Circular Abutment in Dental Implants in the Anterior Maxillae#1140794
Record · ID 919100
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive