PhilArchive
open access
_Dianoia_ & Plato’s Divided Line
This paper takes a detailed look at the Republic’s Divided Line analogy and considers how we should respond to its most contentious implication: that pistis and dianoia have the same degree of ‘clarity’ (σαφήνεια). It argues that we must take this implication at face value and that doing so allows us to better understand both the analogy and the nature of dianoia.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Theological and Philosophical Analysis of The Divided Mind: Contending Descartes#730382
- The Unfolding Account of Forms in the _Phaedo_#73740
- Deleuze and Mereology: Multiplicity, Structure and Composition#710189
- Akrasia and Self-Rule in Plato's Laws#777171
- Teleology, Causation and the Atlas Motif in Plato's _Phaedo_#775224
Record · ID 92008
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive