arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Computer Science Conferences Should Require Nonrepudiable Experimental Results
This position paper argues that computer science conferences should require tamper-evident, nonrepudiable attestations of experimental results. We name the underlying problem experiment nonrepudiation: a compliant protocol must bind the numbers in a paper to an actual executed computation in a way t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Computer Science Conferences Should Require Nonrepudiable Experimental Results#925152
- Computationalism under attack#712037
- Forgeable Confirmation in Automated Computer Security Testing: Deterministic Rules versus AI Judges#1050383
- Forgeable Confirmation in Automated Computer Security Testing: Deterministic Rules versus AI Judges#1028597
- Epistemic issues in computational reproducibility: software as the elephant in the room#740217
Record · ID 920918
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive