arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Democratic ICAI: Debating Our Way to Steering Principles from Preferences
Preference-based alignment often struggles to capture the reasoning that underlies human judgments. Many evaluations rely on multiple interacting criteria, yet pairwise labels reveal only the final choice rather than the considerations that shape preferences. Inverse Constitutional AI (ICAI) improve
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Democratic ICAI: Debating Our Way to Steering Principles from Preferences#925191
- Democratic ICAI: Debating Our Way to Steering Principles from Preferences#319656
- Disagreement, AI alignment, and bargaining#82814
- Moral Disagreement and the Limits of AI Value Alignment: a dual challenge of epistemic justification and political legitimacy#113449
- From Constitutions to Control: Interpretable Rewards for Aligning Language Models#1117798
Record · ID 920956
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive