Europe PMC
open access
Potential and pitfalls of personal reference intervals in general practice: A focus group and case vignette study among Dutch general practitioners
Background Personalised medicine is increasingly used in clinical practice and tailors care to individual characteristics. A new application in laboratory diagnostics is personalised reference intervals (PeRIs). Unlike population-based reference intervals (PoRIs), PeRIs use previous results
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mindray Pediatric Hematology Reference Intervals Study#913005
- The Switch from Reference Biologic Medicines to Biosimilars in France: The Perspective of Patients and Prescribers on Barriers and Needs#171623
- Feasibility of n-of-1 Trials - a Pilot Study#1113441
- Relisten: Enhancing Care Quality and Saving Time With Automatic Clinical Note Generation in Primary Care#896367
- Perception of Family Medicine Residents on the Use of Small Group Discussion in Comparison to Standard Lectures#427271
Record · ID 922277
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive