arXiv (All)
open access
Reviewing the Reviewer: LLM-Assisted Reviewer Feedback Generation for Guideline Compliance
Peer review is central to scientific quality, yet reliance on simple heuristics, namely lazy thinking and non-specific critiques, has threatened review quality. Prior work frames lazy thinking detection as single-label classification and stops at detection, yet review segments often exhibit multiple
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reviewing the Reviewer: LLM-Assisted Reviewer Feedback Generation for Guideline Compliance#919822
- Review essay#721648
- A New Paradigm for Scientific Publishing, Peer Review, and Impact Assessment#270356
- Review: On What Matters#752174
- ITT for project 10181660 — UK RESEARCH & INNOVATION — A GUNN CONSULTING#782190
Record · ID 924051
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive