arXiv (All)
open access
Improving Evaluation Realism with Inference-Time Compute and Deployment Scaffolds
A core obstacle to alignment evaluation is evaluation awareness: capable models can tell when they are being tested rather than deployed, weakening the conclusions a safety evaluation can support. We present two techniques that make simulated alignment evaluations harder to distinguish from real dep
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Improving Evaluation Realism with Inference-Time Compute and Deployment Scaffolds#919967
- Multilingual Safety Signals Are Multi-Layered: Filtering Safety-Degrading Data for Safer LLMs#1036827
- ESSA: Evolutionary Strategies for Scalable Alignment#987451
- Alignment Whack-a-Mole : Finetuning Activates Verbatim Recall of Copyrighted Books in Large Language Models#1123051
- Dual-Adversarial Safety Alignment: Cultivating Intrinsic Threat Comprehension in LRMs#441681
Record · ID 924198
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive