arXiv (All)
open access
LivingArena: Do LLMs Know What Other LLMs Don't? Peer-Probing as Scalable Evaluation
Fixed benchmarks are costly to renew and cannot adapt their questions to model-specific failures. We ask whether LLMs can instead discover one another's weaknesses and turn those observations into an evaluation process. To study this question, we introduce \textbf{LivingArena}, an automated peer-pro
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LivingArena: Do LLMs Know What Other LLMs Don't? Peer-Probing as Scalable Evaluation#920394
- Running the Gauntlet: Hard Agentic Tasks#1129300
- Evaluating LLM-Based 0-to-1 Software Generation in End-to-End CLI Tool Scenarios#2702
- Agora: Toward Autonomous Bug Detection in Production-Level Consensus Protocols with LLM Agents#241560
- Report from the IETF Workshop on Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Infrastructure, May 28, 2008#502911
Record · ID 924626
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive