arXiv (All)
open access
Most $(0,1)$-polytopes are not normal
We prove that the proportion of $0/1$-equivalence classes of $d$-dimensional $(0,1)$-polytopes that are normal tends to zero at least at a double exponential rate as $d\to\infty$. As a consequence, the same holds for any of the following classes given by the type of triangulation possible: (a) quadr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Most $(0,1)$-polytopes are not normal#920673
- Maximal symmetry rank and almost non-negative curvature in low dimensions#1013317
- Polytopal bases for barycentric subdivisions#986330
- NeuralSRNF: Neural Square Root Normal Fields for the Statistical Shape Analysis and Generation of Nonrigid 3D and 4D Objects#1064272
- Four hyperplanes do not always equipartition a mass in $\mathbb{R}^4$#999856
Record · ID 924907
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive