arXiv (All)
open access
Beyond Compilation: Evaluating Faithful Natural-Language-to-Lean Statement Formalization
Lean verifies that a generated declaration is well typed, but not that it expresses the statement a user intended. We study two questions for autoformalization without canonical Lean targets: whether LLM judges can provide a usable proxy for human semantic review, and how much compilation overstates
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Compilation: Evaluating Faithful Natural-Language-to-Lean Statement Formalization#920957
- Assessing the Promise and Pitfalls of ChatGPT for Automated CS1-Driven Code Generation#1141217
- Lean parsing: a natural language processing system and method for parsing … — Intuit Inc. (US12019978B2)#607292
- PrepBench: How Far Are We from Natural-Language-Driven Data Preparation?#175364
- Towards Tackling Application Logic Flaws through Autonomous Formal-Logic Modeling and Automated Reasoning#673437
Record · ID 925192
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive