arXiv (All)
open access
Who Speaks for the Pruned? Visual Token Pruning as Coverage Optimization
Visual token pruning reduces the inference cost of vision-language models (VLMs), but most methods only ask which tokens to keep. This retained-token view can keep redundant high-scoring tokens while leaving discarded evidence without a close representative. We propose CoverPruner, a training-free p
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- TReVS: Integrating Textual Relevance and Visual Saliency for Efficient Vision-Language Model Token Pruning#1141898
- Don't Send What You Don't Need: Question-Guided Token Pruning as a Privacy Defense for Vision-Language Models#1109649
- AnchorPrune: Relevance-Anchored Contextual Expansion for Visual Token Pruning#999823
- Learning to Predict Middle-Layer Attention in MLLMs for Visual Token Pruning#987776
- Query Independent Variable Rate Visual Token Coding#1154827
Record · ID 925520
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive