arXiv (All)
open access
Two Truths and A Lie? Benchmarking Off-the-Shelf LLMs for Requirements Quality Assessment: Performance, False Alarms, and Misses
Requirements engineering (RE) governs the quality of everything downstream in systems engineering (SE); defective requirements that survive review cycles propagate into design rework, schedule delays, and cost overruns. Because requirements are often written in natural language, recent advances in g
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Two Truths and A Lie? Benchmarking Off-the-Shelf LLMs for Requirements Quality Assessment: Performance, False Alarms, and Misses#639745
- Assessing requirements compliance scenarios in system platform subcontracting#1090864
- Simplifying Requirements Engineering in the Context of the LGPD: An LLM-Based Investigation#448004
- From Code to Requirements: Agentic Reverse Engineering of Business Rules at Enterprise Scale#1037402
- From Code to Requirements: Agentic Reverse Engineering of Business Rules at Enterprise Scale#1028781
Record · ID 925587
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive