arXiv (All)
open access
Refusing the Impossible: A Taxonomy and Benchmark for Code Hallucination in Large Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) often produce code that looks plausible but is not grounded in reality. The code may import packages that do not exist or claim to implement algorithms that violate proven theorems, while still compiling and running. We study \emph{code hallucination} as \emph{ungrounded
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Energy-Efficient Code Generation Using Large Language Models: A Systematic Literature Review#1048583
- Are Large Language Models Smart Coders? Evaluating Correctness and Efficiency of LLM-generated Algorithms#349460
- Scalable Token-Level Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models#178887
- The Universal Abstract LLM Conjecture: Toward a Substrate-Independent Theory of Generative Systems and the Reconstruction of Individual Implementations#718025
- OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocation#16603
Record · ID 925617
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive