arXiv (All)
open access
Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation vs. Long-Context Input for Clinical Reasoning over EHRs
Objective: To evaluate whether retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can serve as an efficient alternative to long-context prompting for clinical reasoning over electronic health records (EHRs). Methods: We defined three EHR-based tasks that are replicable across health systems and vary in reasoning
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Validating exacerbations of asthma in electronic health records: a systematic review.#236002
- Linking Patient Encounters across Primary and Ancillary Electronic Health Record Systems: A Comparison of Two Approaches#425517
- A generative AI-enhanced intelligent service system with contextual retrieval and adaptive interaction for hospital use.#440682
- Smart-device Apps as Memory Aids#908620
- TC-RAG:Turing-Complete RAG's Case study on Medical LLM Systems#925721
Record · ID 925804
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive