arXiv (All)
open access
Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework
Despite remarkable progress on reasoning benchmarks, current LLM evaluation practice remains anchored to final-answer correctness, providing limited insight into how models reason, how reliably they behave under contextual variation, or how efficiently they reach conclusions. This paper proposes a u
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LLM-based Agentic Reasoning Frameworks: A Survey from Methods to Scenarios#1156205
- Explore-on-Graph: Hybrid Embedding-LLM Reasoning for Knowledge Graph Question Answering under Incompleteness#1144953
- Candidate supply and answer selection shape the value of LLM judging in multi-agent systems#799099
- Candidate supply and answer selection shape the value of LLM judging in multi-agent systems#797676
- Ontology-Grounded, Reasoner-Verified Benchmarks for Evaluating LLM Reasoning in Scientific AI#1155617
Record · ID 926044
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive