arXiv (All)
open access
Decoupled Analysis-Judging: An Automated Creativity Evaluator Using LLMs in Complex Multi-step Creativity Tasks
Automated evaluation of creativity tasks remains challenging for LLM-as-a-Judge, as LLM is susceptible to biases such as verbosity bias and leniency bias. Such limitations are particularly evident in Contextually-Grounded and Procedurally-Structured Tasks (CGPST), a complex multi-step creativity tas
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- International Conference on Computational Creativity (review)#1178533
- Can LLM Agents Discover? Evaluating Creativity on ML Engineering Tasks#799286
- Can LLM Agents Discover? Evaluating Creativity on ML Engineering Tasks#797863
- SONAR: Task-Aware Code Summary Evaluation for LLM Consumers Without References#429435
- Codifying the Judge: Scalable Evaluation via Program Distillation#1117526
Record · ID 926353
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive