arXiv (All)
open access
When Models Edit Too Much: On the Fidelity of Minimal Code Edits
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to edit existing code, but correctness alone is not enough: useful repairs should also be minimal, reviewable, and faithful to the original implementation. We study over-editing, the tendency of a model to rewrite code beyond what is required to fix
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Line-Anchored Feedback Cuts Token Costs and Improves Correctness in AI Code Editing#366316
- When Edit Flows are Edit Jumps: replicating Edit Flows and EvoFlows#1012912
- When Edit Flows are Edit Jumps: replicating Edit Flows and EvoFlows#965421
- crispAIPE: Probabilistic Modelling of Prime Editing Variant Correction Efficiency#627791
- A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK ON THE USE OF LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLMS) AND PROMPTENGINEERING IN SCREENWRITING PROCESSES”#381630
Record · ID 926906
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive