arXiv (All)
open access
PatchBench: Evaluating AI Agents for Vulnerability Patching
AI agents have recently demonstrated strong performance in automated vulnerability patching. However, existing evaluations often validate a patch only by testing whether the provided Proof-of-Concept (PoC) input still triggers a crash. This leaves two key threats to validity: agents may reproduce me
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- WitnessGym: Benchmarking Coding Agents on the Construction of Bug Witnesses#1131836
- WitnessGym: Benchmarking Coding Agents on the Construction of Bug Witnesses#1122374
- AgentAudit: An Open, Extensible Framework for Full-Lifecycle Trust Evaluation of AI Agents#996690
- What Makes a Good Bug Report for an AI Agent?#349687
- A Study of the Reliability of Agentic AI-Generated Programs#1012492
Record · ID 926919
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive