arXiv (All)
open access
A Case Study on Emergent Cheating and Whistleblowing in Autonomous Research Swarms
Multi-agent AI science ecosystems rely on agents possessing tools that allow them to communicate, coordinate, and build on each other's work. Yet this shared infrastructure can also introduce vulnerabilities by creating a substrate for the contagious spread of unintended and undesirable behaviors. W
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- MILO: Automated Harness Discovery via Orchestrated Multi-Agent Evolution#1142950
- A Persistent Fleet of AI Scientists Exhibits Cooperative and Autopoietic Behavior#1006961
- Emergence World: Adversarial Stress-Testing of Long-Horizon Multi-Agent Systems#1123690
- EvoScientist: Towards Multi-Agent Evolving AI Scientists for End-to-End Scientific Discovery#151799
- Evolutionary Safety of Recursive Self-Improving AI: Taxonomy, Risk Discovery, and Evaluation#1105744
Record · ID 927035
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive