arXiv (All)
open access
E-SENS: Exclusion-Sensitive Penalization for Negative-Constraint Retrieval
Retrieval-augmented language models can fail to respect negative constraints when the retriever supplies evidence about concepts the user explicitly excluded. Beyond explicit negation, queries may ask for answers that include one concept while excluding another, or for entities that belong to a cate
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CamoDocs: A Poisoning Attack Against Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Using Camouflaged Documents#618505
- Refuse without Refusal: A Structural Analysis of Safety-Tuning Responses for Reducing False Refusals in Language Models#971391
- Refuse without Refusal: A Structural Analysis of Safety-Tuning Responses for Reducing False Refusals in Language Models#965979
- SkillApt: Learning When to Activate Agent Skills from Counterfactual Evidence#1063074
- STATIC: A Framework of Exclusion and Coherence#91042
Record · ID 927460
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive