arXiv (All)
open access
What Attention Recalls and Recurrence Controls in Hybrid Language Models
Hybrid language models combine attention with a fixed-size recurrent state, but the role of each channel remains unclear. We introduce two cache-level interventions. Split-prefill keeps only the KV cache or only the recurrent state from a prefilled context, then generates an answer. State-swap pairs
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AMU:Admission and Memory Update for Personalized Conversations---Structured Memory with SLM Guided Control#1132177
- A scoping review of large language models for generative tasks in mental health care#1180151
- Defying syntactic preservation in Alzheimer's disease: What type of impairment predicts syntactic change in dementia (if it does) and why?#377723
- Higher-order thalamic bursts are drivers of attention control.#425064
- On The Effectiveness-Fluency Trade-Off In LLM Conditioning: A Systematic Study#999812
Record · ID 927724
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive