arXiv (All)
open access
Matched Starts, Divergent Objects: How Human-AI Collaboration Forms What It Explains
Scholarly knowledge is typically encountered in stabilized form, while the process histories through which research objects, claims, and contributions acquire form remain largely hidden. This study examines how human-AI scholarly collaboration develops under matched starting conditions and whether t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reciprocal Collaboration: how lessons from convergence in GLAMs can enhance interdisciplinary AI research#1061928
- The Present and Future Landscape of AI in Scholarly Publishing#436051
- Artificial Intelligence and the Epistemic Frontier: Reconfiguring Authority, Authorship, and Inquiry in Academia#88943
- How ChatGPT undermines my research productivity#95781
- A Persistent Fleet of AI Scientists Exhibits Cooperative and Autopoietic Behavior#1006961
Record · ID 927821
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive