arXiv (All)
open access
Why Is SHAP Not a Reliable Standalone Explanation Framework for Malware Detection?
Machine learning is widely used for malware detection, but its decisions must be explained. An analyst needs to know whether a model has learned genuine malicious behavior or only dataset-specific patterns \cite{gaur2021semantics}. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) is the standard tool for this,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Why Is SHAP Not a Reliable Standalone Explanation Framework for Malware Detection?#660756
- Explaining Neural Networks with Reasons#72778
- MCIR: A Feature Dependence-Aware Explainability Method with Reliability Guarantees#1156912
- GroupSegment-SHAP: Shapley Value Explanations with Group-Segment Players for Multivariate Time Series#662391
- GroupSegment-SHAP: Shapley Value Explanations with Group-Segment Players for Multivariate Time Series#661341
Record · ID 927897
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive