PsyArXiv
metadata only
A Computational Account of Approach-Avoidance Conflict in a Foraging-Inspired Search Paradigm
An approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) arises when the same action promises reward but also carries potential harm. Here, we examined how humans initiate and sustain engagement under such conflict using an online foraging-inspired AAC task. Eighty-seven participants repeatedly encountered visual searc
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Computational Account of Approach-Avoidance Conflict in a Foraging-Inspired Search Paradigm#928099
- Beyond Scalar Choice: Foraging as a Policy Framework for Decision Neuroscience#1054841
- Beyond Scalar Choice: Foraging as a Policy Framework for Decision Neuroscience#1040281
- More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search#492608
- Picking the Right Piece: How Action Intentions Shape Visual Search and Action Planning in Foraging#1135420
Record · ID 928435
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive