PsyArXiv
metadata only
The Origins of Musicality [Response to Ghazanfar & Steingo (2025)]
Ghazanfar and Steingo open their Perspective by asserting that, because no fossil or archaeological record of early music-making exists, modern researchers “rely as much on conjecture as they did in Darwin and Spencer’s time.” This characterization is inaccurate. The evolution of musicality can be r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Comparative Study of Johann Baptist Cramer’s 84 Studies; Muzio Clementi’s Gradus ad Parnassum, OP. 44; Johann Nepomuk Hummel’s Etudes, Op. 125; and Carl Czerny’s School of Velocity, Op. 299#1090758
- Prospettive fenomenologiche sul suono. Tracce di un dialogo inconcluso#88102
- Demande de renouvellement d'agrément au titre du Conservatoire botanique national du Bassin parisien : Bilan d'activités sur la période 2017-2025#15433
- Epigenesis and Generative Power in Descartes's Late Scholastic Sources#77435
- Comunicação, indústria fonográfica e tecnologia: novos cenários, mediações e transformações na produção musical#946860
Record · ID 928439
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive