PsyArXiv
metadata only
Evaluating Open-Weight Large Language Models for Structured Depression Assessment from Clinical Interviews
The administration of semi-structured clinical interviews for depression assessment is resource-intensive and susceptible to rater drift. While large language models (LLMs) offer potential for automated quality assurance, reliance on proprietary models creates data privacy barriers incompatible with
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating Open-Weight Large Language Models for Structured Depression Assessment from Clinical Interviews#29838
- Large language models for depression assessment from brief daily diaries#637620
- Large language models for depression assessment from brief daily diaries#637134
- Large Language Models for Mental Health Prediction: Scoping Review of Bias and Clinical Utility Documentation in 2019-2024#454515
- When Consistency Becomes Bias: Interviewer Effects in Semi-Structured Clinical Interviews#1014641
Record · ID 928511
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive