Springer Nature OA
open access
CC BY 4.0
Will AI save ethics—and make ethicists obsolete?
In 1982, Stephen Toulmin famously argued that medicine “saved the life of ethics.” This article asks whether AI is now doing something similar—and finds that the answer splits. Working from a broadly Toulminian conception of ethics as a discipline that responds to societal demand for normative orien
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- High-reward, high-risk technologies? An ethical and legal account of AI development in healthcare#679067
- Bioethics met its COVID‐19 Waterloo: The doctor knows best again#748270
- A Literature Review on Ethics in Medical Diagnostic AI & Analysis Therein#332987
- Research Ethics Before Proof of Subjecthood: A Subject-Facing Protection Framework for Welfare-Relevant AI Research#1136352
- Ethics in the Age of AI : A Call for Value-Based Progress / Sarah Spiekermann-Hoff#1052476
Record · ID 928599
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive