PhilArchive
open access
"Fiction, Imagination, and Narrative"
In a series of publications, Derek Matravers has challenged what he calls the “consensus view” of the nature of fiction. According to this consensus view, there is a conceptual route that starts with the notion of a prescription to imagine and that ends up with a systematic distinction between fiction and non-fictional representations. This paper engages in a systematic reconstruction of Matravers’ argument against the consensus view as well as a rebuttal of recent rejoinders offered by Gregory Currie and Kathleen Stock. It concludes that the challenge against the consensus view, once properly understood, still stands.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Conciliationism and Fictionalism#741217
- Models, Fictions, and Realism: Two Packages#748218
- Belief and the Contemporary Scene: A Philosophical Appreciation of Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI)#99163
- The Epistemic Role of Fiction in Scientific Models#106189
- Fictioning Philosophy: Epistemological and Methodological Foundation of a Prospective Hermeneutics for Advanced Technologies#732228
Record · ID 93566
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive