NYU Faculty Digital Archive
metadata only
Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst Recommendations
We investigate directly whether analyst behavior influenced the likelihood of banks winning underwriting mandates for a sample of 16,456 U.S. debt and equity offerings sold between December 1993 and June 2002. We control for the strength of the issuer’s investment-banking relationships with potentia
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst Recommendations#942687
- Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst Recommendations#942486
- Do Markets React to Bank Examination Ratings? Evidence of Indirect Disclosure of Management Quality Through BHCs' Applications to Convert to FHCs#942632
- Conference calls and information spillover: the role of analyst participation#195014
- Strategies in Banking and Financial Services Firms: A Survey#942712
Record · ID 942465
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive