Repositorio de Universidad Autónoma de Chile.
metadata only
The online dispute resolution, access to justice and protection of consumer rights in electronic commerce: the Chilean case
This study aims to make a comparison between the self-composition (normative self-regulation) of online dispute resolution (ODR) and state regulatory intervention (hard law) concerning the treatment of consumer rights in B2C relationships. The article proposes that regulatory intervention may not be
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Impact of Electronic Secondary Markets on Information Goods Suppliers#486162
- Law and the Digital Economy : Unlocking Data through Regulation in Brazil and the European Union / by Daniela Copetti Cravo#1132645
- Consumer Awareness Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019: An Empirical Assessment of Consumer Rights, Dispute Redressal Mechanisms, And Penalties Among Respondents with Commerce Education#990569
- The Law and Policy of Online Privacy: Regulation, Self-Regulation, or Co-Regulation?#462114
- The Regulation of Consumer Financial Products: An Introductory Essay with Four Case Studies#245344
Record · ID 948208
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive