PhilArchive
open access
Contraception as Contralife
An in-depth critique of arguments of John Finnis, Germain Grisez, Joseph Boyle and William May to the effect that contraception is necessarily contralife in the sense of exhibiting a will against a possible person.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Impact and Cost-effectiveness of Safer Conception Strategies for HIV-discordant Couples (SAFER)#850015
- Corporate Conscience and the Contraceptive Mandate: A Dworkinian Reading#225352
- Contraception is not a reductio of Marquis#74442
- A Complex Contraception Registry#884196
- Contraception today and family planning: a comprehensive review and position statement on the ethical, medical, and social dimensions of modern contraception#26199
Record · ID 95362
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive