SU+ Digital Repository
metadata only
Interpreting the silence of section 35 of the arbitration act 1995: a judicial dilemma for the Kenyan courts
At the heart of judicial interpretation, lies the difficult task of identifying legislative intent. 1 Words, as expressive as they may be, are many times unclear. Each of them represents a living thought inscribed by the drafters of the law. 2 Likewise, the unexpressed intention of the legislature,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Judges of Character#1019389
- Grammatical analysis: its role in the reading of legal texts#1024344
- 9 U.S.C. § 206 — Order to compel arbitration; appointment of arbitrators#563004
- Confronting Silences#87972
- Arbitragem e administração pública: controvérsias sobre a escolha do árbitro#331576
Record · ID 956186
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive